A Description of Required NAPLEX Preparation Courses Among US Pharmacy Programs.

OBJECTIVE: One of the final tasks for pharmacy graduates to enter practice is passing the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX). Given the recent national declines in pass rates, programs are making significant investments of time and money in NAPLEX preparation. The objective is to characterize the structure and content of required NAPLEX preparation courses. METHODS: A survey on NAPLEX preparation practices was developed and distributed to all Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education-accredited pharmacy schools. NAPLEX preparation course syllabi were also collected as part of this survey. Syllabus information was summarized into 4 elements: course structure, content, resources, and assessment strategies. RESULTS: Of 144 colleges/schools of pharmacy, 100 responded to the survey, 87 reported having a NAPLEX preparation program, and 47 reported having a NAPLEX preparation course. Twenty syllabi were collected. Most courses (14) were longitudinal through the Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences year, 16 were credit-bearing, and 19 included a vendor NAPLEX preparatory product. Fourteen courses were hybrid delivery, and 12 focused on licensure preparation and included test-taking strategies, calculations practice, case-based discussions, etc. All 20 courses reported using unproctored timed quizzes and practice examinations, half conducted proctored timed assessments, and 11 included written reflections and/or continuous professional development activities. Most courses were pass/fail (15), and high stakes (16) were defined by delayed or withheld graduation as a consequence for failure. Only 3 of 20 NAPLEX preparation courses were mapped to NAPLEX competencies. CONCLUSION: Although required NAPLEX preparation courses focus on assessments, the content is infrequently mapped to NAPLEX competencies. This project provides some information on how schools might create their own NAPLEX preparatory courses.

NAPLEX Preparation Program Characteristics and Resources Associated With First-Time Exam Pass Rates.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacy colleges and schools invest substantial faculty effort and financial resources in North America Pharmacist Licensure Exam (NAPLEX) preparation, including vendor products purported to improve NAPLEX pass rates. The objective of this project was to examine NAPLEX preparation program characteristics associated with first-time pass rates. METHODS: A national survey investigated which pharmacy schools provided a formal NAPLEX preparation program in the 2021/2022 academic year, and what resources students were required to use. Pharmacy school characteristics and the unique resources provided in NAPLEX preparation programs were separately analyzed for association with 2022 NAPLEX first-time pass rates. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 71% (100 pharmacy schools). Of the 6 pharmacy school characteristics analyzed, offering a formal NAPLEX preparation program and private status were both weakly correlated with a decrease in the 2022 NAPLEX pass rate, while founding year of 2000 or earlier was weakly correlated with an increase in the pass rate. In a generalized linear model, a decrease in 2022 NAPLEX pass rate was associated with offering a formal NAPLEX preparation program (-5.90% [-11.55 to -0.23]) and with a 3-year accelerated curriculum (-9.15% [-15.55 to -2.75]). Of 12 resources required in NAPLEX preparation programs, 3 were weakly correlated with a decrease in 2022 pass rate: a vendor question bank, vendor review book/materials, and a live, synchronous faculty-led review. In a generalized linear model, a decrease in 2022 NAPLEX pass rate was associated with a live, synchronous faculty-led review (-6.62% [-11.16 to -2.08]). Among schools without a formal preparation program, NAPLEX pass rates consistently exceeded the national average in 2020, 2021, and 2022, while the proportion of schools with NAPLEX preparation programs and first-time pass rates above the national average dropped from 59% in 2021 and 58% in 2020 to 44% in 2022. CONCLUSION: Simply implementing a NAPLEX preparation program is insufficient to overcome other systemic/programmatic influences of successfully passing the NAPLEX; programs should invest earlier resources to address NAPLEX competencies.

Impact of a Co-curricular Poverty Simulation on Pharmacy Students' Socioeconomic and Patient Advocacy Attitudes and Beliefs.

Background: Pharmacists are well-positioned to assist patients facing poverty with financial and well-being resource navigation. Pharmacy educators must find avenues for students that foster awareness of applicable challenges encountered by economically disadvantaged patients. Objective: This study examines the impact of a poverty simulation on pharmacy students' socioeconomic and patient advocacy attitudes and beliefs. Methods: Third year professional pharmacy students participated in the Community Action Poverty Simulation (CAPS). Students were asked to voluntarily complete a survey prior to and following their participation. The survey was based upon a combination of 3 previously validated survey tools: Attitudes Toward Poverty (ATP) scale, Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU), and the Locus of Control Scale (LCS). Students also responded to open-ended questions postsimulation. Results: Forty of the 74 students completed both the presimulation and postsimulation surveys. Significant changes were seen in a matched sample analysis for 17 of 49 survey questions. Prominent differences (decreasing agreement) came from the statements: "An able-bodied person collecting welfare is ripping off the system" and "Welfare makes people lazy"; and increasing agreement that "I feel personally responsible for providing medical care to the needy." Open-ended survey responses reflected a greater understanding of time and effort needed to locate and navigate available resources, and challenges such as adhering to medication regimens due to inability to pay. Conclusion: A poverty simulation, such as CAPS, is an effective method to encourage pharmacy students to reflect on their future impact toward patients facing the challenges of poverty. The shift in students' attitudes and beliefs on various measures revealed that the simulation had an impact on altering perceptions for those with low socioeconomic status.

A Description of NAPLEX and MPJE Preparation Strategies Among US Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the different strategies used to supplement North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) and Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) preparation in the US pharmacy programs. METHODS: An online survey was developed to gather information from 141 accredited schools/colleges of pharmacy about the preparation methods used during the 2021-22 academic year. The questionnaire contained 19 NAPLEX- and 10 MPJE-specific questions related to timing, content, use of commercial products and programs, faculty involvement, and whether these activities were required or recommended. Characteristics of schools/colleges were compared based on the presence or absence of preparation programs; preparation programs were descriptively reported. RESULTS: The response rate was 71%. Most schools (87/100 respondents) provided NAPLEX preparation programs starting in the advanced pharmacy practice experiential year, required students to participate, and focused on reviewing the content instead of assessing students' examination readiness. Similar elements were reported among 61 schools providing MPJE preparation programs. Schools used a variety of resources including access to vendor-based question banks or review materials, and completing live, proctored, NAPLEX-like examinations. Characteristics of schools or colleges did not differ significantly based on presence or absence of a preparation program. CONCLUSION: Schools/colleges of pharmacy use a variety of strategies to prepare students for licensing examinations. Many require student participation in vendor-based preparation programs for NAPLEX, and homegrown programs for MPJE preparation. The next step will be to determine the effectiveness of various approaches used by the schools/colleges on first-time licensure examination attempts.

Assessing Multiple-Mini Interview Performance Across Pharmacy Admissions Pathways.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether students who are admitted to a Doctor of Pharmacy program through different admissions pathways (early assurance vs other pathways) have significantly different affective domain competencies, as measured by multiple-mini interview (MMI) evaluations. METHODS: A secondary analysis of existing data was conducted at a single pharmacy school in the upper Midwestern U.S. over 3 admissions cycles. The program offers a 6-year, early assurance admission pathway as well as more traditional admissions pathways which can be completed in 7-8 years. Differences in MMI scores, overall and by individual question, were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No differences in total MMI scores exist between individuals applying through the program's early assurance pathway and those applying through other pathways. In the first admissions cycle, early assurance applicants performed significantly lower on the responsibility MMI item (mean = 7.01 vs 8.50) and significantly higher on the cross-cutting MMI item (mean = 6.95 vs 5.45). In the second admissions cycle, early assurance applicants scored significantly higher on the self-awareness MMI item than other applicants (mean = 8.22 vs 7.14). No statistically significant differences were found between early assurance and non-early assurance applicants during the final admissions cycle. CONCLUSION: Individuals applying through an early assurance pathway produce MMI scores that are similar to individuals applying through other admissions pathways.

Hello Operator? A Pharmacy Practice Simulation to Increase Student Confidence in Telephone Communication Skills.

Background: Communicating interprofessionally using the telephone is an essential skill within pharmacy practice. Student pharmacists' ability to perform this task effectively and efficiently may be hindered by generational changes, social anxiety, and very few opportunities to practice these skills. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and implement a simulation allowing students to practice interprofessional communication and assess the simulation's impact on students' confidence in providing pharmacy-related interventions to another health care professional via telephone. Methods: Faculty developed a simulation focused on interprofessional telephone communication. Baseline student information was collected to quantify pharmacy work experience in terms of practice setting, duration of employment, and skills. Presimulation and postsimulation surveys evaluated self-assessed telephone-related skills, attitudes, and confidence. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were evaluated through a thematic analysis of students' reflective responses to 2 open-ended questions. Results: Of the 53 pharmacy students that participated in the simulation, 44 (83%) and 43 (81%) completed the anonymous presimulation and postsimulation surveys. Students significantly improved as reflected in the following response: "I have confidence in my ability to provide pharmacy-related interventions to another health care professional in a logical and concise manner via telephone call." Significant improvement also occurred in the ability to work independently, communicate an order change to another health care professional, justify recommendations, answer a drug information question, and discuss recommendations in a logical and concise manner. Conclusion: The simulation discussed in this article provided students an opportunity to practice interprofessional telephone communication in a low-risk environment and resulted in significant growth in confidence and skills.

Impact of an Emergency Department Simulation on Pharmacy Students' Interprofessional Team Skills and Attitudes.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of an emergency department simulation on pharmacy students' interprofessional team skills and attitudes as measured by a novel mixed methods approach. Methods: A simulated emergency department encounter was executed by interprofessional teams consisting of pharmacy and medical students. Two rounds of the same encounter were separated by a short debriefing session facilitated by pharmacy and medical faculty. A full, comprehensive debriefing session occurred after conclusion of the second round. Pharmacy faculty evaluated pharmacy students using a competency-based checklist after each round of the simulation. Pharmacy students completed a baseline self-assessment of their interprofessional skills and attitudes pre-simulation, and again post-simulation. Results: Pharmacy students demonstrated significant improvement in providing clear and concise verbal interprofessional communication and using shared decision making to develop a collaborative plan of care, based upon student self-assessment and faculty observational ratings. Student self-assessments also showed significant perceived growth in contributing to the team's plan of care, and demonstrating active listening skills within the interprofessional team. Through qualitative analysis, pharmacy students noted perceived self-improvement in a variety of team-based skills and attitudes including confidence, critical thinking, role identification, communication, and self-awareness. Conclusion: This simulation provided a learning opportunity for pharmacy students to improve their skills related to teamwork and interprofessional collaboration. Based upon a novel a mixed methods assessment, both student self-assessment and faculty observational ratings were associated with significant growth in interprofessional skills and attitudes. This simulation provides a template experience for colleges/schools to meet, at least in part, ACPE Standards related to interprofessional education in collaboration with medical students.

Simulation Design, Findings, and Call to Action for Managing Difficult Patient Encounters.

Objective. To implement and evaluate a laboratory simulation for teaching difficult patient encounter skills to pharmacy students to improve their self-assessed communication abilities and skills in the affective domain.Methods. Twelve simulation scenarios that represented difficult patient encounters in a variety of practice settings were developed. All students completed a self-assessment of their ability to communicate during difficult patient encounters before and after the simulations, and wrote a guided reflection afterward. The impact of the simulation was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methodology. Three student cohorts were analyzed to determine whether significant change occurred in students' self-perceived communication abilities. Thematic analysis of the qualitative reflection responses was performed.Results. Over three years, three student cohorts of third-year professional students participated in the simulations (n=236). Students self-rated their ability to communicate on a 0-100 scale. Mean self-rating of ability prior to the simulation was 57.7 (SD=15.9) and after was 79.2 (SD=15.2). This mean difference of 21.5 points equates to an approximate 20% increase in self-rated ability. Variability in self-ratings between the cohorts was not significant. Qualitative analysis revealed that the simulation identified for student areas needing further development which in turn promoted self-awareness. Students expressed that learning in the safe, formative environment provided by the simulation contributed to their professional growth and was relevant to their future practice of pharmacy.Conclusion. This simulation fills a gap in skills-based education, addresses the affective domain of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards, transfers easily to schools and colleges of pharmacy. This supports a call to action for pharmacy educators to provide purposeful opportunities for students to practice communicating with patients during difficult encounters.

Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities interprofessional team member domain performed by North Dakota pharmacists

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the use of the interprofessional team member (ITM) domain of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) by North Dakota pharmacists across practice sites, roles in practice, and by preceptor status. METHODS: Survey methods were used to characterize the self-reported frequency with which pharmacists undertake core EPAs and supporting tasks in the ITM domain. The survey was administered to registered pharmacists practicing in North Dakota (n=990) during the fall of 2018, of which 457 (46.1%) responded. After eliminating responses with incomplete or missing information, 119 responses were available for analysis. RESULTS: For the overall EPA ITM domain, "Collaborate as a member of an interprofessional team population" pharmacists reported performing these activities an average (mean) of 3.3 times per month (SD=2.3). Within this domain, the highest reported example activity was "Use setting appropriate communication skills when interacting with others" (mean=4.1, SD 1.8), followed by "Communicate a patient's medication-related problem(s) to another health professional" (mean=3.3, SD 2.0), and "Contribute medication-related expertise to the team's work" (mean=3.1, SD=2.2). ITM domain and supporting example activities were performed at a greater rate in hospitals, community health centers and long-term-care facilities. For most items, preceptors reported a greater use of activities, than did non-preceptors. CONCLUSIONS: North Dakota pharmacists currently complete tasks outlined in the ITM domain of the EPAs, although their contributions are varied by task, role, and preceptor status

No disponible

Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities interprofessional team member domain performed by North Dakota pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the use of the interprofessional team member (ITM) domain of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) by North Dakota pharmacists across practice sites, roles in practice, and by preceptor status. METHODS: Survey methods were used to characterize the self-reported frequency with which pharmacists undertake core EPAs and supporting tasks in the ITM domain. The survey was administered to registered pharmacists practicing in North Dakota (n=990) during the fall of 2018, of which 457 (46.1%) responded. After eliminating responses with incomplete or missing information, 119 responses were available for analysis. RESULTS: For the overall EPA ITM domain, "Collaborate as a member of an interprofessional team population" pharmacists reported performing these activities an average (mean) of 3.3 times per month (SD=2.3). Within this domain, the highest reported example activity was "Use setting appropriate communication skills when interacting with others" (mean=4.1, SD 1.8), followed by "Communicate a patient's medication-related problem(s) to another health professional" (mean=3.3, SD 2.0), and "Contribute medication-related expertise to the team's work" (mean=3.1, SD=2.2). ITM domain and supporting example activities were performed at a greater rate in hospitals, community health centers and long-term-care facilities. For most items, preceptors reported a greater use of activities, than did non-preceptors. CONCLUSIONS: North Dakota pharmacists currently complete tasks outlined in the ITM domain of the EPAs, although their contributions are varied by task, role, and preceptor status.

Evaluation of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) of the population health promoter domain by North Dakota pharmacists

OBJECTIVE: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are a list of professional tasks (with associated competency ratings) that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. This manuscript assesses the perceived frequency of performing EPAs in the population health promoter (PHP) domain among pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. METHODS: This survey assessed the self-reported EPA activities (inclusive of the PHP domain) of registered pharmacists living and practicing in North Dakota. There were 990 pharmacists surveyed, and 457 (46.1%) of pharmacists responded. RESULTS: Within the PHP domain, pharmacists reported performing "Minimize adverse drug events and medication errors" most frequently (mean=3.4, SD=2.0), followed by "Ensure that patients have been immunized against vaccine-preventable diseases" (mean=2.3, SD 2.3), "Maximize the appropriate use of medications in a population" (mean=2.2, SD 2.3), and "Identify patients at risk for prevalent diseases in a population" (mean=1.3, SD=1.9). In these Core EPAs PHP domains, the clinical pharmacists reported the highest level, followed by pharmacy managers and staff pharmacists. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in North Dakota reported that EPAs in the PHP domain are practiced regularly. Thus, EPAs in the PHP domain have potential as a means to assess outcomes in pharmacy education and practice

No disponible

Evaluation of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) of the population health promoter domain by North Dakota pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are a list of professional tasks that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations encourage, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript evaluates the perceived frequency of performing EPAs in the population health promoter (PHP) domain among pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. METHODS: This survey evaluated the self-reported EPA activities of registered pharmacists living and practicing in North Dakota. For EPAs and supporting tasks in the 6 domains (including the PHP domain), respondents were asked to self-report the number of times during the last 30 days that they perform the task, using a 6 point response scale (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or more times). There were 990 pharmacists surveyed, and 457 (46.1%) of pharmacists responded. RESULTS: Within the PHP domain, pharmacists reported performing "Minimize adverse drug events and medication errors" most frequently (mean=3.4, SD=2.0), followed by "Ensure that patients have been immunized against vaccine-preventable diseases" (mean=2.3, SD 2.3), "Maximize the appropriate use of medications in a population" (mean=2.2, SD 2.3), and "Identify patients at risk for prevalent diseases in a population" (mean=1.3, SD=1.9). In these Core EPAs PHP domains, the clinical pharmacists reported the highest level, followed by pharmacy managers and staff pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists in North Dakota currently perform some population health promoter activities, but not at a consistent and high level. Most of the health prevention activities were medication-related and oriented towards individual patients (micro-level), rather than at a community (population-based) macro-level.

Increasing adult immunization rates in a rural state through targeted pharmacist education.

BACKGROUND: Most immunization rates fall below the Healthy People 2020 goals for adults. Pharmacists have the potential to have a positive effect on immunization rates through vaccine administration. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess if an educational program developed for pharmacists could increase pharmacist-delivered statewide immunization rates. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: This study was conducted in the state of North Dakota. North Dakota law allows authorized pharmacists to provide any immunization to individuals aged 11 years or older. PRACTICE INNOVATION: In collaboration with the state health department, a needs assessment of North Dakota pharmacists was conducted to determine what resources and education could increase the delivery of immunizations within the pharmacy. The results were used to develop focused continuing pharmacy education material, create an online toolkit, and provide immunization administration certification. EVALUATION: The number and proportion of pharmacist-delivered immunizations and overall adult immunizations rates were compared pre- and postintervention. The North Dakota Immunization Information System was used for data comparison. In addition, the number of pharmacists registered to provide immunizations with the State Board of Pharmacy was tabulated. RESULTS: The number of pharmacist-provided immunizations increased by more than 3900 doses. In addition, the percentage of adult immunizations provided by pharmacists and overall adult immunization rates increased throughout the state. After adjusting for seasonality, there was an increase in the number of pharmacist-delivered pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine immunizations (P < 0.001). The number of pharmacists registered to provide immunizations increased throughout the study period by 39%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that focused education and resources delivered to pharmacists can increase pharmacy-based immunization rates and adult immunization rates overall. Improving adult immunization rates through greater pharmacist engagement may help to decrease overall infectious disease threats.

Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are the latest addition to a list of professional competencies that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: The study's objective is to assess the use of Core EPAs in the patient care domain (by practice setting, position, and preceptor status) in contemporary pharmacy practice. METHODS: This survey assessed the EPA activities of pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. The pharmacists were asked "how many times in the past 30 days have you delivered the following services in your practice setting?" Response options were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more times. RESULTS: Of 990 potential respondents, 457 pharmacists (46.1%) returned a survey, and 107 (10.8%) answered every survey item in the patient care domain. Respondents reported that the highest rated activity items "Collect information to identify a patient's medication-related problems and health-related needs," and "Analyze information to determine the effects of medication therapy, identify medication-related problems, and prioritize health-related needs" were performed an average of 3.9 times per week (SD=1.8), and 3.8 times per week (SD=2.0), respectively. Both of these items, were reported for 70% of the respondents at 5 or more times per week. For these items, the highest reported practice setting was 'other' practice settings (e. g. , long-term care, community health centers) followed by chains, hospitals, and independent pharmacies. By position, clinical pharmacists and preceptors reported the highest activity levels for most EPAs and supportive example tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence suggesting (but not proving) that EPAs have potential as a means to assess outcomes in pharmacy education and practice. Our study sets the stage for future work that further refines and assesses core EPA activities and supportive example tasks to measure the impact of how this process relates to outcomes of care

No disponible

Impact of Achieved Tenure and Promotion on Faculty Research Productivity at a School of Pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: Critics of the promotion and tenure system contend that promotion and tenure may lead to a decline in research productivity ("dead wood phenomena") by those faculty. To assess this perception, we compiled the publications and grants at the time of application for promotion, and again through 2017 for the same faculty following promotion and/or tenure. METHODS: Promotion documents at a school of pharmacy at a public Midwestern university were assessed. Mean publication rates and grant dollars per year per faculty member were compared to the same group of faculty (n=13) pre and post-promotion. RESULTS: At the time of promotion to associate professor, mean numbers of total publications per year per faculty in the pharmacy practice department were 1.1, compared to 1.4 post-promotion. For pharmaceutical sciences department faculty, corresponding means were 5.0 and 4.1, respectively. At the time of promotion to full professor, mean numbers of total publications per year for pharmacy practice faculty were 7.0, compared to 7.2 post-promotion. For pharmaceutical sciences faculty, corresponding means were 3.5 and 4.7, respectively. For grant activity, both associate professors and full professors increased the mean total dollars per year from pre-promotion to post-promotion for both departments. CONCLUSION: Research productivity at this school of pharmacy continues to be either maintained or increased since promotion for the collective group of faculty. This evidence runs counter to the perception that promotion and tenure may lead to decreased scholarly productivity. The study provides a roadmap for other schools/colleges to quantify research productivity and make comparisons to national mean levels reported in the literature.

Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are the latest addition to a list of professional competencies that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: The study's objective is to assess the use of Core EPAs in the patient care domain (by practice setting, position, and preceptor status) in contemporary pharmacy practice. METHODS: This survey assessed the EPA activities of pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. The pharmacists were asked "how many times in the past 30 days have you delivered the following services in your practice setting?" Response options were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more times. RESULTS: Of 990 potential respondents, 457 pharmacists (46.1%) returned a survey, and 107 (10.8%) answered every survey item in the patient care domain. Respondents reported that the highest rated activity items "Collect information to identify a patient's medication-related problems and health-related needs," and "Analyze information to determine the effects of medication therapy, identify medication-related problems, and prioritize health-related needs" were performed an average of 3.9 times per week (SD=1.8), and 3.8 times per week (SD=2.0), respectively. Both of these items, were reported for 70% of the respondents at 5 or more times per week. For these items, the highest reported practice setting was 'other' practice settings (e.g., long-term care, community health centers) followed by chains, hospitals, and independent pharmacies. By position, clinical pharmacists and preceptors reported the highest activity levels for most EPAs and supportive example tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence suggesting (but not proving) that EPAs have potential as a means to assess outcomes in pharmacy education and practice. Our study sets the stage for future work that further refines and assesses core EPA activities and supportive example tasks to measure the impact of how this process relates to outcomes of care.

The Effect of Prerequisite Pharmacodynamics Course Timing on Student Performance in Pharmacotherapy Courses.

Objective. To evaluate the impact that decreasing the time from 12 to three months between prerequisite pharmacodynamics courses and their corresponding pharmacotherapy courses had on overall student performance in the pharmacotherapy courses measured by course examination scores. Methods. Two cohorts of second-professional year (P2) and third professional year (P3) classes, respectively, following different curriculum plans, simultaneously took two pharmacotherapy courses (infectious disease and neoplastic disease). Admission data (age, gender, prior bachelor's degree status, grade point average (GPA), Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score, and interview score) were collected to establish baseline characteristics between the two cohorts. Examination scores in the corresponding prerequisite pharmacodynamics and pharmacotherapy courses were also collected. The variable was the difference in time each cohort experienced between the prerequisite pharmacodynamics courses and the subsequent pharmacotherapy courses. Results. No difference was found in baseline admission characteristics between the two cohorts, except for increased average age, which favored the P2 cohort. In the infectious disease pharmacotherapy course, the P3 cohort performed better than the P2 cohort as measured by average examination scores. In the neoplastic disease pharmacotherapy course, the P3 cohort also achieved significant higher average examination scores than the P2 cohort. The P3 cohort achieved higher overall scores than the P2 cohort in both courses despite a longer interval between the applicable pharmacodynamic and pharmacotherapy courses (12 months vs 3 months, respectively). Conclusion. Shortening the time interval from 12 months to three months between prerequisite and requisite courses did not result in improved, or even equivalent, academic performance relative to the P2 cohort that had only a 3-month interval between courses. Placing like content closer together, as the only intervention, is not enough to ensure improved student performance measured by examination scores in corresponding requisite courses.

The health sciences reasoning test in the pharmacy admissions process.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of including Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT) scores in the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) admissions process compared with other criteria used. METHODS: The HSRT was administered to all prepharmacy students who were selected for an interview (n=122) as part of the PharmD program admissions process. The HSRT score and other evaluation criteria were used to establish candidate rankings. The correlation between total HSRT scores and other measures used in the admissions process then was evaluated. RESULTS: Candidate rankings were not noticeably different when the HSRT scores were excluded from the admission process. The HSRT scores were significantly and highly correlated with applicants' Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) cumulative percentile scores. CONCLUSIONS: The HSRT can be an effective method to evaluate critical-thinking ability as part of the admissions process into a PharmD program. However, the usefulness of the HSRT as an admissions screening tool is mitigated by information redundancies with other evaluation criteria, specifically the PCAT.

Evaluation of an interview process for admission into a school of pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) admissions interview process at North Dakota State University (NDSU). METHODS: Faculty pairs interviewed candidates using a standardized grading rubric to evaluate qualitative parameters or attributes such as ethics, relevant life and work experience, emotional maturity, commitment to patient care, leadership, and understanding of the pharmacy profession. Total interview scores, individual attribute domain scores, and the consistency and reliability of the interviewers were assessed. RESULTS: The total mean interview score for the candidate pool was 17.4 of 25 points. Mean scores for individual domains ranged from 2.3 to 3.0 on a Likert-scale of 0-4. Nine of the 11 faculty pairs showed no mean differences from their interview partner in total interview scores given. Evaluations by 8 of the 11 faculty pairs produced high interrater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The current interview process is generally consistent and reliable; however, future improvements such as additional interviewer training and adoption of a multiple mini-interview format could be made.

Poster project to emphasize public health in the pharmacy curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To implement and assess a required public health poster project in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) program. DESIGN: Third-year PharmD students collaborated in pairs to research a public health topic relating to pharmacy practice. Each student group prepared an informational poster, while receiving feedback from a faculty mentor at each stage of the project. The students presented their completed posters at a statewide pharmacy conference. ASSESSMENT: Faculty members evaluated the posters with a grading rubric, and students completed a survey instrument that assessed the overall experience. In general, faculty members rated the class highly across all domains of the grading rubric. The class generally agreed that the poster project increased their awareness of public health issues related to pharmacy practice, overall knowledge of public health, and presentation skills. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a poster project was well received by students and faculty members as an effective method for enhancing public health instruction in the PharmD program at North Dakota State University.